{"id":448,"date":"2014-12-19T11:46:11","date_gmt":"2014-12-19T10:46:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.temphist.dk\/?page_id=448"},"modified":"2023-01-23T07:51:00","modified_gmt":"2023-01-23T06:51:00","slug":"abstract06","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.temphist.dk\/?page_id=448","title":{"rendered":""},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>ABSTRACT (DK)<\/strong><br \/>\nLea Brinkgaard<br \/>\n<em>En ungdom uden kriminalitet: straf, velf\u00e6rd og neoliberalisme i Danmark, 1990-2010<\/em><\/p>\n<p>I forskningen om de sidste \u00e5rtiers \u2019straffende vending\u2019, er de nordiske velf\u00e6rdsstater ofte blevet fremstillet som en undtagelse. I denne artikel nuancerer jeg <em>Nordic Exceptionalism<\/em>-tesen med en historisk analyse af indsatsen over for ungdomskriminalitet i Danmark fra 1990 til 2010. Jeg tilslutter mig studier, der har vist, at straf og velf\u00e6rd ikke st\u00e5r i mods\u00e6tning til hinanden, men er dybt sammenflettet og forankret i velf\u00e6rdsstatens historie. Men med empirisk udgangspunkt i fire indsatser fra perioden 1990 til 2010, deres velf\u00e6rdsshistoriske kontekst samt inspiration fra Lo\u00efc Wacquants neoliberalismebegreb, tilf\u00f8jer jeg, at ungdomskriminalitetsindsatsen <em>ogs\u00e5<\/em> var influeret af en bredere neoliberalisering af den danske velf\u00e6rdsstat. Denne udvikling indeb\u00e6rer, at statens sociale funktioner tr\u00e5dte i baggrunden til fordel for de markedsorienterede og straffende. P\u00e5 trods af en r\u00e6kke ligheder med ideerne bag B\u00f8rneloven fra 1905 samt den senere ungdomsf\u00e6ngselsordning fra 1933 til 1973, viser jeg s\u00e5ledes, at kriminalitetsindsatsen over for unge i perioden 1990-2010, ogs\u00e5 rummede en r\u00e6kke nyskabelser. Disse indbefatter at 1) straf og konsekvens blev centrale (diskursive) mark\u00f8rer; 2) unge blev opfattet (og skulle opfatte sig selv) som ansvarlige forbrugere; 3) for\u00e6ldrenes ansvar genindtr\u00e5dte og blev oprustet; 4) unge drenge med etnisk minoritetsbaggrund og deres familier blev et nyt interventionsm\u00e5l.<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p><strong>ABSTRACT (UK)<\/strong><br \/>\nLea Brinkgaard<br \/>\n<em>Youth Without Crime: Punishment, Welfare, and Neoliberalism in Denmark, 1990-2020<\/em><\/p>\n<p>According to the literature proclaiming a \u2018punitive turn\u2019 in recent decades, the Nordic welfare states are often perceived an exception. In this article I nuance the <em>Nordic Exceptionalism<\/em> thesis with a historical analysis of how youth crime was understood and handled in Denmark from 1990 to 2010. I study four concrete initiatives introduced between 1990 and 2010 in relation to their welfare historical context and with theoretical inspiration from Lo\u00efc Wacquant&#8217;s conception of neoliberalism. While not opposing the convincing studies arguing that punishment and welfare are not contractionary, but, rather, deeply intertwined and rooted in the history of the welfare state, I add, that the efforts towards youth crime from 1990 to 2010, were <em>also<\/em> influenced by a broader neoliberalization of the Danish welfare state. This development, I argue, implies that the state&#8217;s social functions were revamped in favor of the ideals and premises of market-oriented and punitive. Despite similarities with the ideas behind the Children&#8217;s Act from 1905 and the later youth prison system from the 1933 to 1973, I show that the initiatives towards youth crime from 1990 to 2010 also contained renewals. These include that 1) punishment and consequence became key (discursive) markers; 2) young people were perceived (and should perceive themselves) as responsible consumers; 3) the responsibility of the parents was reactivated and strengthened; 4) ethnic minority boys and their families became a new target for intervention.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ABSTRACT (DK) Lea Brinkgaard En ungdom uden kriminalitet: straf, velf\u00e6rd og neoliberalisme i Danmark, 1990-2010 I forskningen om de sidste \u00e5rtiers \u2019straffende vending\u2019, er de nordiske velf\u00e6rdsstater ofte blevet fremstillet som en undtagelse. I denne artikel nuancerer jeg Nordic Exceptionalism-tesen &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.temphist.dk\/?page_id=448\">L\u00e6s resten <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.temphist.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/448"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.temphist.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.temphist.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.temphist.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.temphist.dk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=448"}],"version-history":[{"count":19,"href":"https:\/\/www.temphist.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/448\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1013,"href":"https:\/\/www.temphist.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/448\/revisions\/1013"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.temphist.dk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=448"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}