{"id":436,"date":"2014-12-19T11:44:03","date_gmt":"2014-12-19T10:44:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.temphist.dk\/?page_id=436"},"modified":"2023-01-02T09:39:01","modified_gmt":"2023-01-02T08:39:01","slug":"abstrac01","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.temphist.dk\/?page_id=436","title":{"rendered":""},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>ABSTRACT [DK]<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Astrid \u00d8lgaard Christensen Schriver &amp; Helle Strandgaard Jensen<br \/>\n<em>Arkivets digitalisering En ny udfordring til historisk metode?<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Arkivlandskabet, en helt central forskningsinfrastruktur for historikere, underg\u00e5r i disse \u00e5r massive forandringer. Digitalisering og online-tilg\u00e6ngelighed af b\u00e5de samlinger og kataloger har v\u00e6ret en prioritet i kulturarvssektoren i \u00e5rtier. Studier har vist, at historikere er storforbrugere af digitalt tilg\u00e6ngeligt materiale, men indikerer ogs\u00e5, at de bruger dem uden megen tanke p\u00e5 den metodiske indflydelse, de nye digitale praksisser har p\u00e5 deres arbejde. En m\u00e5de at udfordre denne manglende interesse, er at g\u00f8re forst\u00e5else af digitale arkiver (og hvordan man kan g\u00f8re bedre brug af de muligheder de tilbyder) til et centralt metodisk sp\u00f8rgsm\u00e5l for historiefaget.<br \/>\nDenne artikel bidrager til diskussionen af, hvordan arkivers digitalisering p\u00e5virker historiefaget. Vi viser, hvordan dette sp\u00f8rgsm\u00e5l er s\u00e6rlig vigtigt i en dansk kontekst, fordi arkivet som faktor i historieskrivning stort set er blevet ignoreret i den nordiske kildekritiske tradition. Med Det Kgl. Biblioteks digitale samling af luftfotos som eksempel viser vi, hvordan digitale arkiver qua deres produktion, interface design og tekniske set-up yder indflydelse p\u00e5 den m\u00e5de historikere forst\u00e5r og interagerer med det kildemateriale, digitale arkiver indeholder. P\u00e5 den m\u00e5de bidrager vores resultater til den stigende forst\u00e5else af de komplekse faktorer, der former digitale arkiver, og dermed p\u00e5virker historikeres arbejde.<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p><strong>ABSTRACT [UK]<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Astrid \u00d8lgaard Christensen Schriver &amp; Helle Strandgaard Jensen<br \/>\n<em>Digitization of Archives. A New Challenge in Historical Methods? <\/em><\/p>\n<p>The archival landscape, which historians rely upon as a central research infrastructure, is changing \u2013 a change which has massive implications for the discipline of history. Digitization and online availability of collections and catalogues have been a priority for cultural heritage institutions for decades and studies have shown how historians use digitized sources extensively. Other studies, however, have also shown that historians do so without much consideration of the methodological impact these new digital practices have on their research. One way to challenge such lack of interest is to make better understanding of digital archives (and how to appropriately explore the possibilities they offer) a key methodological issue within our discipline.<br \/>\nThis article contributes to the discussion of how archival digitization impacts historians. We demonstrate the urgency of the question in a Danish context by considering how the role of archives as co-producers of history has largely been ignored in the Nordic tradition of source criticism. Taking the Royal Danish Library\u2019s digital aerial photograph archive as an example, we show how digital archives via their production, interface design, and technical set-up influence the ways in which historians understand and interact with the source materials that digital archives contain. In doing so, our findings contribute to the emerging understanding of the complex interplay of factors that shape digital archives and impact the work of historians.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ABSTRACT [DK] Astrid \u00d8lgaard Christensen Schriver &amp; Helle Strandgaard Jensen Arkivets digitalisering En ny udfordring til historisk metode? Arkivlandskabet, en helt central forskningsinfrastruktur for historikere, underg\u00e5r i disse \u00e5r massive forandringer. Digitalisering og online-tilg\u00e6ngelighed af b\u00e5de samlinger og kataloger har &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.temphist.dk\/?page_id=436\">L\u00e6s resten <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.temphist.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/436"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.temphist.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.temphist.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.temphist.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.temphist.dk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=436"}],"version-history":[{"count":19,"href":"https:\/\/www.temphist.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/436\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":997,"href":"https:\/\/www.temphist.dk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/436\/revisions\/997"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.temphist.dk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=436"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}